What site and business leaders must know, ask and do to prevent a major accident
The flyer below is the printable A4 version. Use the buttons above to download it or the request form.
Site managers, department heads, business-unit leaders and board members with accountability for process safety; new managers moving into hazardous-plant roles
After Texas City the Baker Panel found that leadership had measured the wrong things and asked the wrong questions. This half-day session gives leaders a working understanding of major-accident hazards, the barriers that control them and the management system that keeps the barriers working, then focuses on their own role: the questions to ask on a site visit, the indicators to review, the signals of a decaying programme and the decisions on budget, staffing and production that shift risk.
Texas City, Buncefield and Deepwater Horizon: what leadership did and did not do · major-accident hazards and barriers · the PSM system in one page · leading indicators and what they really say · the leadership questions
Warning signs of a decaying programme · culture: reporting, response to bad news, challenge · resourcing and competency decisions · site walk and conversation practice · personal commitments and follow-up
CCPS Risk Based Process Safety (Process Safety Culture, Leadership)OGP Report 452 Process Safety: Recommended Practice on Key Performance IndicatorsEI Process Safety Management FrameworkAPI RP 754Seveso III DirectiveSend a short brief — plant, service of interest and what you need to achieve — and a Cerasus engineer will respond with a proposed scope and next steps.
Prefer email or phone? sales@cerasus.ai · +974 5506 2743