Selecting, defining and using leading and lagging indicators that drive action
The flyer below is the printable A4 version. Use the buttons above to download it or the request form.
HSE and process safety managers, PSM coordinators, data owners and site leadership who review process safety performance
A dashboard of lagging indicators tells management about last year's accidents. The course explains the four API RP 754 tiers, the classification rules for Tier 1 and 2 events, and how to select Tier 3 and 4 leading indicators that measure the health of barriers and management systems. Participants build an indicator set for their own site, define each indicator so it is counted the same way every month, and configure it in CeraPulse.
Why metrics failed at Texas City and Buncefield · API RP 754 structure and tiers · Tier 1 and 2 classification rules and worked examples · Tier 3 barrier indicators · Tier 4 management-system indicators · CCPS and IOGP guidance
Indicator definition and data quality · targets, normalisation and Safety Performance Index · building the site indicator set · dashboards and reviews in CeraPulse · reporting to leadership and the board · common pitfalls
API RP 754CCPS Process Safety Leading and Lagging MetricsIOGP Report 456HSE HSG254CCPS Risk Based Process SafetySend a short brief — plant, service of interest and what you need to achieve — and a Cerasus engineer will respond with a proposed scope and next steps.
Prefer email or phone? sales@cerasus.ai · +974 5506 2743